Drexel University Home Pagewww.drexel.edu DREXEL UNIVERSITY LIBRARIES HOMEPAGE >>
iDEA DREXEL ARCHIVES >>

iDEA: Drexel E-repository and Archives > Drexel Academic Community > College of Information Science and Technology > Research Day Posters (IST) > Differences in user-centeredness in a large R&D organization

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1860/1620

File Description SizeFormat
2007021025.pdf150.14 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Title: Differences in user-centeredness in a large R&D organization
Authors: Allendoerfer, Kenneth R.
Keywords: Usability
User-centered design
Software development
Case studies
Issue Date: 17-Apr-2007
Publisher: Drexel University. College of Information Science and Technology.
Series/Report no.: IST Research Day 2007 posters
Abstract: Many organizations employ formal methodologies for developing systems and software. Formal methodologies help ensure that systems meet requirements, increase the predictability of outcomes, help manage complexity, and reduce risk. Expertise and certification in prominent methods can also serve promotional purposes for the organization. Despite these benefits, there appears to be much less methodological standardization in how organizations engage in user-centered activities, such as user interface design and usability testing. This study examines this issue in a single large research and development organization that emphasizes formal methodology in its software development. The study examined why different projects within the organization engaged in different amounts and types of user-centered activities. We interviewed system engineers and human factors engineers involved with four different system development projects. We developed case studies for each project and identified several trends. First, user-centered activities are sometimes seen as being more expendable than other parts of the development process and therefore are more likely to be cut when delays or cost overruns occur. Second, when the formal methodology did not specifically include steps for user-centered design or usability testing, it was difficult for engineers to incorporate such activities because there was nowhere to put them due to resource constraints. Finally, several participants reported that their projects included user-centered activities mainly because the system engineers had first been exposed to human factors on earlier projects.
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/1860/1620
Appears in Collections:Research Day Posters (IST)

Items in iDEA are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

 

Valid XHTML 1.0! DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2007 MIT and Hewlett-Packard - Feedback